Book a demo See the demo
Use cases

Eight situations, one platform.

The same product is set up differently for a clinic group, a council, a school, a firm of sixty people and an IT provider with twelve clients. Pick the one that sounds like your week — each panel is written as the answer to one specific objection, including what we would need from you to start.

The explorer

Read it here, or open the full page.

Use the arrow keys or click a situation. Everything shown is the same content as the dedicated page, in one place, for when you are skimming rather than reading.

Public sector

Government, councils & shared services

Shared IT serves several directorates, agencies or business units that are funded separately but share infrastructure, and each one has to be able to report only on itself. Every access decision has to be explainable months later.

What it costs you today

  • Access reviews are reconstructed from memory and spreadsheet exports.
  • A directorate cannot prove its data was never visible to another directorate.
  • External auditors ask who touched a record, and the answer takes days.
  • Systems are split by cost centre rather than by who actually needs to see what.

What the desk does about it

  • A wall, not a filter — Each directorate is a separate tenant on one platform. Separation is enforced server-side against your signed-in session, so it holds even if a URL is edited.
  • Access you can explain later — Sessions, sign-ins and sensitive changes are recorded, and an administrator can review active sessions and end one immediately.
  • Step-up for the sensitive actions — The actions that change money, exports or permissions can require a second check rather than trusting an open session.
  • Reporting per directorate — Each unit gets its own dashboards and board pack from the same records, without a second system or a manual cut of the data.

“Who touched that record?”

Shared services IT, three directorates, one platform

  1. Sign in as a service-desk analyst in Directorate A — the tenant switcher shows only A.
  2. Open a ticket, an asset and a person record. Everything resolves inside A.
  3. Paste the URL of a ticket that belongs to Directorate B into the address bar.
  4. The record does not open: the session is A, so the platform answers for A only.
  5. Review the session list, end an old session, and export the access record for the auditor.

What we would need from you

  1. How the directorates, cost centres and reporting lines are structured today.
  2. Who must see what, in writing — the access matrix is the design.
  3. Your current ticketing export (CSV is fine) and your asset register.
  4. Two 60-minute sessions to agree the service catalogue and the categories.
The isolation conversation takes six minutes instead of an assurance project, and the evidence is a record rather than an explanation.

What we can stand behind

  • Tenant separation is decided on the server against the signed-in session — never from a value the browser supplies.
  • Administrators can see active sessions and revoke one without disturbing anyone else.
  • Enquiry-to-tenant discovery uses a signed, short-lived handoff — no tenant identifier or secret is carried in a public URL.
  • Full export of your records at any time, in an open format.

Where to go next

One desk across several directorates, with an audit trail that answers a records request without anyone reconstructing a timeline by hand.

What actually happens

From first call to a working desk.

No discovery phase that produces a document nobody reads. The staged version below is how it runs, and each stage has a defined end so you always know what you have paid for.

1

Twenty minutes, your tickets

You bring three real requests or an export of last month. We work them in your categories and run the isolation test. At the end you know whether this is worth a second conversation.

2

Written scope, not a brochure

What is being configured, what is being migrated, what is included, what is excluded, who owns each side, and a date range. Priced per organisation, in writing, before anything starts.

3

Configuration and migration

Sites, teams, categories, service catalogue, deadlines and dashboards. Users, assets and open tickets come across from CSV or an export of your current desk. Your structure, not a template.

4

Population and rehearsal

Real requests, run end to end, with your people watching. This is where the knowledge base gets its first twenty articles — the twenty things that actually break.

5

Live, then measured

The desk goes live with both paths available: your team works it, or we do. At the end of month one we report on what the routine share actually was, which replaces every estimate with a number from your own records.

Every stage is a stop point. You can stop after the demo, after the scope, or after the migration. Nothing rolls on automatically and there is no lock-in contract.
Also a good fit

If the desk is somewhere inside your organisation.

The eight above are the ones we plan for in advance. These are the conversations that come up next, and there is no new product required for any of them.

In-house IT teams

Keep your engineers. We give them the desk, the asset register and the reporting they are currently maintaining by hand — plus the assistant for the requests that never needed a person.

Facilities and maintenance

The same mechanics as an IT desk: work orders, assets, deadlines per team, and a history attached to the thing that broke rather than to the ticket.

Group head offices

Several operating businesses under one parent. Each trading entity keeps its own records and its own reporting; head office sees the roll-up it is entitled to and nothing more.

Franchise networks

Franchisee, company-owned and support-office sites separated properly, sharing the template and the service catalogue rather than the data.

Programs and funded projects

Grant-funded work that has to report to a funder on evidence rather than on a summary written from memory.

Vocational and training providers

Intake cycles, loan equipment, room systems and the student-facing service catalogue, without a per-student licence surprise.

Tell us which one sounds like your week.

Twenty minutes, your own requests, and the isolation test. Bring the awkward one — that is the useful conversation.